Welcome to a Special Edition (See what I did there?) of Top Ten Things, here at Enuffa.com! It's time for a ranking of the live-action Star Wars
films, making this technically a Top Eleven Things....
I literally can't remember a time before
Star Wars came into my life. I was 18 months old when it came out, and I'm not sure when exactly I saw the original film. I think it was probably during the 1979 re-release but I can't be sure. I am however certain that I saw
Empire multiple times in the theater between 1980 and 1982, and rushed out to see
Return of the Jedi in '83. The original unaltered trilogy is still my favorite series of films (I can't watch the Special Editions anymore, I just can't), and it's still the yardstick by which I measure every other movie trilogy.
When the prequels were released from 1999-2005 I was hooked on those right away too. Only later as I actually thought about them did I realize how far short they fell, and for the better part of a decade I'd resigned myself to being an OT purist. But then Disney bought the property and took the series back to all the things I'd originally loved about it - enduring characters, profound themes, thrilling battles, and visually stunning worlds and creatures. The
Star Wars series was ready to expand, for realsies this time.
But how do the films stack up against each other? Well if you read my intro the lowest-ranked entries should be no surprise. So let's get to it - here are my rankings for the
Star Wars live-action films.....
11. Attack of the Clones
Sigh... yeah, I gotta get through the three bad ones before I get to the good ones. Look, when the prequels first came out I was so blinded by my love of
Star Wars that I couldn't see the glaring, logic-defying, nonsensical plot contrivances that made the story being told incomprehensible. And I was so dazzled by "oooh, lightsabers!" that I forgave the embarrassing performances from nearly every cast member (Seriously, Natalie Portman is an Oscar-winning actress and George Lucas failed to get even one passable performance out of her in these films). The specific problems with the prequels have been explored ad nauseum, so I won't go into too much detail, but suffice it to say, there really isn't one redeeming thing about
Attack of the Clones. The storyline of Obi-Wan discovering an illegally created clone army that the Republic then actually uses(??) makes no sense and is pointless as the main plot of a film. Why wasn't the middle chapter of this trilogy dedicated to the actual Clone Wars? Isn't that what everyone was looking forward to, aside from seeing the creation of Darth Vader? Instead we get the very beginning of the Clone Wars here and it turns out to be a fake war orchestrated by Palpatine just so he can remain in power, while not one of our protagonists can see through this shovel-to-the-face obvious ploy. Plus we get the worst love story ever put to film. Plus we get PlayStation One-esque CGI in every frame. Plus the aforementioned terrible acting. Plus the "I don't like sand" speech. This stuff is Ed Wood-bad.
Attack of the Clones is the worst live-action theatrical
Star Wars film.
10. The Phantom Menace
Only slightly less terrible is
Episode I, in which the dialogue is every bit as cringeworthy, the story every bit as preposterous, and the acting equally wooden. Plus fucking Jar Jar. Damn, this is a tough call.... But what
The Phantom Menace has over
Clones is twofold - the pod racing sequence is fun, despite being a totally convoluted way just to get Anakin off Tatooine, and Darth Maul is a badass villain, despite only having ten minutes of screen time and no real character to speak of. From a technical standpoint the lightsaber duel in this film is the best of the series (Sure, there's exactly zero going on between the participants, but the choreography is cool at least). So those two aspects are enjoyable, even if the rest of the film isn't. But yeah,
The Phantom Menace is drivel.